02 · PERFORMANCE

The results I have earned—and the context they need.

These numbers mark real moments in my development. I keep official races, training tests, and retrospective estimates separate because they do not carry the same level of certainty.

FIRST OFFICIAL 100M12.30s

My first electronically timed 100m race · April 2026

FLYING 10M1.00s

Electronic training test · improved from 1.10 seconds

40-YARD DASH4.60s

Standing-start team assessment · September 2025

APPROACH VERTICAL95cm

Best five-step approach jump · fall 2025 case · measured after deload

OFFICIAL 100M CHANGE−0.85s

From the first official race to the current official PB: approximately 6.9% less elapsed time.

FLYING 10M CHANGE−0.10s

From 1.10 to 1.00 seconds: 9.1% less time, equivalent to a 10.0% increase in average segment speed.

HOW I READ ITA result is a checkpoint, not an explanation.

Training blocks, sprint technique, physical development, recovery, and testing conditions all changed over time. The improvement is real; the exact share caused by each factor is not something this dataset can isolate.

HOW I LABEL THE EVIDENCE

Honest categories make comparisons more useful.

OFFICIAL

I report 11.45 as my official electronically timed competition PB. I do not have a digital result available for independent checking. Electronic timing alone does not confirm fully automatic timing, and without the wind reading I cannot confirm whether the mark was wind-legal.

OBSERVED

The 40-yard dash and flying 10m were electronically measured training or team tests.

ESTIMATED

The earlier squat 1RM references in my fall 2025 case are estimates from working weight and RPE. The final 130 kg single and 95 cm approach jump were actual post-deload tests. The original paper training log is currently unavailable.